Is God willing to prevent
evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is
he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?
-
Epicurus
Why are atheists so arrogant? Atheists
are people just like you, some good and some bad. And if you frequent Internet
sites frequently, odds are you'll run into more than your share of jerks of all
stripes, atheists included.
But what generally motivates
this question is when people run into a "strong atheist" who makes
the positive assertion that "there is no God". This comes across as
an unwarranted and unprecedented assault on the listener and all people who
believe in anything spiritual or theological. I suspect it's this feeling of
being assaulted that's behind the reflexive charge of arrogance more than
anything.
Professor “Richard Dawkins” is
best-known as a vociferous critic of religion and a champion for the cause of
science. So much so that he is often attacked for being dogmatic himself, in
believing only his own preferred worldview should triumph. Some thought his latest
book; The Magic of Reality - aimed at children, and explaining the scientific
truth behind primitive mythologies - had gone beyond the pale in preaching
literalism as the 'one true way'. (http://old.richarddawkins.net/articles/646756-graham-hancock-questions-richard-dawkins-on-psychedelics-and-challenging-his-world-view)
He says, that every people can
or may experience some kind of trance, according to the right chemical
stimulant, it may vary from religious upbringing like for instance the “Virgin
Mary” for Catholics and so on. So he decided to take a hallucinogenic drug and
try it for himself, as people in the ancient time uses psychoactive plants for
shamanistic purposes, maybe “Richard Dawkins” wants a firsthand experience in
what may lay in the so called spirit world when you take a drug like this.(http://dailygrail.com/Shamanism/2012/8/Richard-Dawkins-Would-Trip-LSD)
So He took “Graham Hancock”
suggestion that he may try the (DMT-containing) shamanic brew from the Amazon,
ayahuasca. As “Graham Hancock” quoted "have you ever seriously engaged
such techniques to have first-hand experience of what they're talking about,
and perhaps even to challenge your own concept of what is real?" and
“Dawkins” answered "I would be very curious, I must say, to take, perhaps
not that drug, but something like LSD or mescaline," he responded. "I
would be prepared to do that under proper medical supervision, if I were
absolutely convinced that it would do me no lasting harm. And I would actually
like to do it." In the above
statement as said “Dawkins“is somehow curious about the experiment but just
like other skeptics, he wants to prove that sometimes what we can see is not
all about religion and hallucinating “Gods” nor “angels” but he wants to prove
the wonders that the brain can do when used by a right chemical stimulant, that
can trigger this functions. (http://dailygrail.com/Shamanism/2012/8/Richard-Dawkins-Would-Trip-LSD)
No comments:
Post a Comment